Home :: Leadership :: Objectives :: Mission Statement :: Facts :: Join :: Get Involved :: Endorsements :: Contact

AN EFFORT FOR COMMON GROUND

 A Proposed Angler/Conservation Organization Collaborative Agreement For The Upper Delaware River

Literally for decades, individual anglers, various fly fishing organizations, area businesses, conservation organizations and interested citizens have all spoken with many individual voices in expressing their concerns about the upper Delaware fishery.  Yet, it seems that despite the differing rhetoric, often there has been a common ground; a common, if unrecognized, sharing of related concerns. 

If that is so, then it would also seem that an agreed to framework – based on common agreement on at least some of the common issues - could be developed that would reduce the many individual voices to a few (perhaps even ultimately to one) collective voice.  Certainly a single collective voice – on agreed to issues – would be far more influential than numerous individual voices on all issues.   

To accomplish a common ground – a framework that would enable a more unified, and accordingly, a more influential voice – it would seem necessary to first set forth a draft, then to solicit input to that draft from a broad a spectrum of interests, to consolidate that input, and then to put forth a second draft incorporating that input.

The following is that initial draft.  We ask that you read and evaluate each of the tentative points carefully and reply back to us as to (a) which of these points should be included in a common agreement; (b) if so, what if any modifications would you recommend? (c) are there any additional points that should be included?

1- We agree to advocate for a constant release based policy - that replaces the current complex and ineffective system of banks, flow targets and temperature targets - from the Cannonsville, Pepacton and Neversink Reservoirs. 

2- We agree that any forthcoming release policy that does not safeguard the needs for the established coldwater habitat in the main stem is unacceptable.  Thus, we oppose any policy that effectively ‘writes off’ the main stem fishery.

3.  We agree that a scientific solution must continue to be pursued to determine the available water in the system for the fishery, NYC and other downriver municipal and commercial users.  Within these constraints, coldwater releases from Cannonsville should be at levels sufficient to protect the wild trout fishery on the Delaware’s upper main stem.

4- We agree that any scientific solution must include Rondout Reservoir (49.6 billion gallons), must scientifically evaluate and revise the current drought curves, and must change and improve the current management system of release implementation. 

5- We agree that neither short term (i.e. Revision 8), nor long term solutions, should rely upon computer models that are acknowledged to be either sub-par or incomplete.  In other words, solutions must be based  models that have been independently validated as being complete, accurate and the best available for specific applications.

6- Using sound scientific information, we agree to pursue and educate our legislatures with complete and accurate data.   

7- Research conducted to date suggests a relatively simple structure for a constant summertime release policy would suffice; we agree, however, that releases may at times need to be reduced, in accordance with reservoir levels, so that less water is released when less water is available.  Deductions of releases for the fishery should be commensurate with New York City reductions and downstream user restrictions.

8.  We agree that non-summertime releases are also important, and we recognize the necessity of formulating a sensible winter release policy

9- We agree that it is extremely important that fall flow levels, commencing when Brown trout begin to spawn (late September through October), be maintained through the winter so that the redds are protected and, further, that these winter flow levels also be sufficient to avoid anchor ice.

10-.  We agree that the DRBC should take the initiative to create a centralized - independently validated - and publicly accessible electronic database for analysis of Delaware River polices and practices.

11- We agree that any and all resolutions, policies, agreements, etc., need to be legally binding, with appropriate – public - enforcement and accountability measures.

12- We agree that West Branch/main stem silting problems must be addressed by restoration work on Cold Spring Brook and Butler Brook, and by avoiding draining Cannonsville below thirty percent when the Pepacton and Neversink reservoirs are relatively full.

13- We agree that releases from the reservoirs should be ramped (changed gradually) over an acceptable period of time, rather than abrupt changes, which damage trout habitat and aquatic insects.

14- We agree that stocking of the East Branch should be abandoned and the stream be allowed to become a wild trout fishery.

Home / Leadership / Objectives / Accomplishments / Facts / Join Get Involved / Endorsements  /  Contact Us

  FUDR  ::   1148 5th St., New York, NY 10128   ::  email: info@fudr.org  ::    315-656-8313